Saturday, 7 February 2015

Raw gas versus natural gas and the risk of radon.

Isn't The raw gas coming out of the ground a different mix depending on the extraction method?

including radon? It seems to me a bit disengenous to refer to natural gas as the homogenous pure filtered end product rather than the raw gas. That's a bit like comparing moonshine alcohol with triple filtered vodka. And calling the triple filtered vodka natural.

 Key terms. Radon in shale gas. Cost of production. Condensate removal. Mercury removal H2S removal 

What are the actual chemical properties of the raw gas coming out of a fracking well as opposed to other sources of natural gas? 











Mike Hill and a note on our gold plated regulations

A note on our gold plated regulations.
http://youtu.be/486TCvzz_Pg


See also this from Barton moss
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=FCl-l6DnJSQ

The only reason we have a more sensible discussion in this country and it isn't already happening is because a group of dedicated individuals trying to slow the dash for gas to have a sensible discussion about it such as this guy Mike hill

Regulations and lack Mike Hill on Fracking Regulation


at RAFF meeting - Lytham 29-04-12
Independent Engineer
18 month study on regulation in this country and was deeply concerned.




Newsnight fracking regulation lack thereof



See also.  http://frackingvideos.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/west-newton-case-study-hse-breach.html
http://frackingvideos.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/west-newton-case-study-hse-breach.html



,





Wednesday, 4 February 2015

fracking and fresh water contamination

"No reported cases of groundwater contamination due to the process of

fracking".

 

http://youtu.be/Mq-8nCCGSzg

 

Terry greenwood ... He's dead now .... Strange cancer killed him and his livestock.

 

That is in part due to the Haliburton loophole making fracking exempt from legal prosecution of the clean water act. A number of cases have been hushed up with confidentiality agreements. This is all starting to unravel in the us.

 

Fresh Water is contaminated when the process starts by adding the chemicals to create slickwater. This is a contamination event.

 

This slickwater is Contaminated further by the explosive process of fracking creating NORM sludge.

 

This water brine is then put in ponds that are open to wildlife and nearby livestock.

Floods can wash away these pools and containers. Lightning can and has damaged The containers.

 

In Some cases of abandoned wells in Pennsylvania the evaporation pools where just bulldozed Without cleanup. In flood risk areas.

 

There are cases of

Waste water brine being dumped on roads and fields.

There are cases of wastewater being pumped into waste water injection wells Causing earthquakes.

There are cases of wastewater being dumped into canals or lakes.

Earthquakes caused by fracking can have an indirect effect of contaminating water supplies.

http://www2.epa.gov/hfstudy

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-reese-halter/fracking-poisons-californ_b_5986758.html

http://journalistsresource.org/studies/environment/energy/fracking-shale-gas-health-effects-research-roundup

 

Jessica Ernst

 

http://youtu.be/4zPsefMA-70

 

http://youtu.be/hIkqqYkjuDM

 

http://youtu.be/TO2A97itUyA

 

http://youtu.be/hMTaEqQf8QY

 

http://youtu.be/ezLu5WGeM-0

 

http://youtu.be/aU6DJE9h6uc

Fracking and water usage

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/feb/05/fracking-water-america-drought-oil-gas

 

When people talk of swimming pools and golf courses per well. That needs to be multiplied by 100s If not 1000s for industrial scale fracking production.

This is fresh water remember. The same stuff that had hose pipe bans and "droughts"not so long ago.

At least 50 percent of the freshwater used is completely lost to the water cycle. The rest is contaminated by the "secret" ice cream ingredients going down and the radioactive NORM sludge coming back up.

Some of the slickwater brine waste is injected into waste water wells that have been linked to earthquakes. Which is further lost from the water cycle water system.

Some has been found to have contaminated drinking water aquifers... So this water isn't lost to the water system but does contaminate it.

Some is left in evaporation ponds that are open to wildlife and livestock. These are also open to flooding see the colorado floods and how sensible it is to build in a flood plain. In pensylvania some of these Evaporation salt pits were just bulldozed over and covered up in flood risk areas.

When we talk of brine and salt this isn't normal salt sodium chloride this is other chemical salts with health risks.

Some is used legally and illegally as dust suppression on roads.

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/environmentallawprogram/files/2013/01/elpc-comments-on-wgmr064-final-no-appendices-11.16.11.pdf

 

In America some of

It is just dumped in fields in the uk it was dumped into a manchester canal.

http://bakken.com/news/id/75668/north-dakota-oil-patch-truckers-dumping-illegal-waste-rarely-caught/

 

http://www.messengernewspapers.co.uk/news/10971603.MP_demands_answers_on_why_waste_water_from_fracking_was_dumped_into_the_Manchester_Ship_Canal/?ref=rss

 

http://www.propublica.org/article/the-other-fracking-north-dakotas-oil-boom-brings-damage-along-with-prosperi

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-25902272

http://www.salon.com/2012/09/22/the_trillion_gallon_wastewater_loophole/

 

There are cases of evaporation ponds above leaking to lower livestock drinking ponds

http://www.desmogblog.com/2014/07/24/after-rancher-s-death-calls-fracking-health-study-grow-stronger

 

Fracking and radon gas quick literature search… and summary.

Fracking and radon gas quick literature search… and summary.
Good practice would be to do a baseline radon EIA environmental impact assessment and then continue with assessments every month to 6 months.
Radon is produced when fracking.    Is this a cost worth paying by the people living near it?  As a nation should we care enough to stop and think about consequences?
Radiation accumulates in particular areas of production.   Whether it is the pipes used in the vertical drilling or the sludge pits or the containers used to hold the waste NORM sludge.
Dealing with the pipes and waste products safely is essential and in America has been ignored.   I am trying to find the video about the scrap metal yards in America that had to install gieger counters to refuse taking old drilling pipes that were highly radioactive.
With installing pro fracker PR spin doctor at the head of the EA what hope is there that Britain would be any different.   Looking at the shocking history of fracking in America all the ecological questions and local issues were shut down at a higher level by industry influenced politicians.   This culture of silence and corruption is starting to unravel.
A related problem is abandoned disowned wells with no one looking after them
Just because other sources of energy production are worse does not validate fracking. 
Take for example the south downs near where I live,  I wouldn’t want a nuclear plant up there, a coal mine up there or a fracking site up there.   Using one bad thing to justify another bad thing is not a valid argument.  Im not sure I would want the current generation of wind turbines up there but I would prefer that to fracking.   Offshore for it all imho.  And work on wave capture and localised hydrogen production with the excess energy.
See this report from the American association of radon scientists and technologists.
http://www.ukradon.org/cms/assets/gfx/content/resource_3265csf4334c131c.pdf




Wednesday, 28 January 2015

Academic links evidence against fracking



Academic resources anti fracking.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-07-23/frackers-fund-university-research-that-proves-their-case


My older post

http://frackingvideos.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/there-are-none-so-blind-as-those-whose.html

I really need to get on the case and write a list of anti fracking academic papers

https://www.zotero.org/groups/pse_study_citation_database/items/q/Fracking

http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&q=fracking+&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5

Case law

http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&q=fracking+&btnG=&as_sdt=2006


List of resources which talk about academic bias

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geoffreylean/100282976/want-to-know-how-fracking-will-affect-you-sorry-thats-a-state-secret/

http://psehealthyenergy.org

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es032338+

http://www.ernstversusencana.ca/

Pressure

http://plashingvole.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/grimms-tale.html

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/nov/28/fracking-risk-compared-to-thalidomide-and-asbestos-in-walport-report

https://pennsylvaniaallianceforcleanwaterandair.wordpress.com/the-list/

http://pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/full_report5.pdf


Blatantly obvious problems

 I think one problem is that some of it is so blatantly obvious. The earthquakes. The traffic logs, projections, accidents and evidence from the us. The fizzing murky water that is safe for YOU to drink that they refuse to. The ex mayor of dish Texas. Deep water horizon and piper alpha as examples of oil and gas safety record.

If it's been printed by a national newspaper it has a certain amount of legal veracity to avoid libel and other legal action.

Manchester illegal dumping
http://www.frackaware.com/wordpress/?p=2128

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-reese-halter/fracking-poisons-californ_b_5986758.html

Earthquakes

Precautionary principle.

Building storage ponds in a flood risk areas. See colorado flooding.

http://articles.latimes.com/keyword/fracking

http://greenparty.org.uk/assets/files/PolicyPointers/Green%20Party%20policy%20pointer%20-%20fracking.pdf


http://www.jku.at/orc/content/e41325/employee_groups_wiss204404/employees219932/subdocs219965/content256025/Willfrackingputtoomuchfizzinyourwater_eng.pdf